Kusukela kulokhu kusetshenziswa kwe-Pinoccio ngenze imidwebo emibili ependwe nge-acrylic ehlanganisa izihloko kupeni lwethiphu elizwakalayo, nemithetho yokubhala esasiyisebenzisa sisebancane. Le midwebo emibili igqugquzelwe umsebenzi womdwebi waseColombia, uJuan Mejía, owayenguthisha wami eCali School of Arts. Lo msebenzi embukisweni wakhe onesihloko esithi "Imfundo Sentimental."

Le misebenzi emibili yayiphathelene nendikimba kaPinoccio (khumbula ukuthi uPinoccio wayengumlingiswa wokhuni owayefuna ukuba nenhliziyo yeqiniso nokuthi lapho ekhuluma amanga, ikhala lakhe libe lide, futhi ikhilikithi kwakungunembeza wakhe) ngangiwakopisha ezithombeni njengaku. incwadi yezindaba engangiyazi futhi ngiseyingane, kodwa imidwebo yayinezihloko ezimbili ezikhethekile. Imidwebo emibili ibonise i-dichotomy, i-bipolarity, okungukuthi umqondo we "Aisthetiké" (i-aesthetics ngesiGreki) kanye nomqondo we "Poiesis". Izikhundla ezimbili eziphikisana kakhulu zomcabango ogxekayo. Njengoba kwaziwa ukuthi kumakhono efilosofi, bekulokhu kukhona lokhu kuhlukana phakathi kwe-Ontology ne-Dialectic (leli gama libhekisela ku-dialectic yesimanje) (isibonelo, futhi phakathi kwe-Materialism-idealism). Kodwa, lokhu kwakubhekisela endabeni yomlobi ogama lakhe linguDonald Kuspit kumagazini waseColombia "Valdéz", le ndaba ihunyushwe nguBernardo Ortíz. "Umculi Olungile" kwakuyigama laleyo ncazelo yefilosofi futhi yayibhekisela ezindleleni ezimbili "zokuba" komdwebi, "iciko lomuntu siqu" kanye "nomculi oyisibonelo ohluphekayo" ngaphezu kokuba, kodwa njengaleso sisekelo sobuhle bukaTheorodo Adorno. uthi, "ngoba futhi ngokumelene, kokubili kuyizici ezimbili zokunyakaza okufanayo." Kimina, lokhu kwakuyindaba yabaculi uJuan Mejía noWilson Díaz, lapho besebenza ndawonye wawukwazi ukubona iziphetho ezimbili zentambo efanayo. Omunye waba ne-schizophrenic kanti omunye empeleni wahlushwa "i-bipolar disorder", kodwa ngemva kwakho konke, ngacabanga ngabo bobabili njengama-corporealists kanye nalowo mbono wokwazi ngaphandle kwabo, owawubonakala uthakazelisa kakhulu kimi. Lo mdwebo we-diptych engiwethula lapha ukhombe umlingiswa ka-Pinoccio eziqeshini ezimbili, enakekela ukwazi ngaphandle kwakhe (kwikhilikithi ekhuluma naye futhi emelulekayo), kanye ne-apula (elingamelela imibono yezinzwa yokunambitha, yokunambitha, ukuthinta, ukubona, ukuhogela, njll) kusemva kwakhe. Kwaba kimi leso sici se-"poiesis" esivela esiGrekini esivame ukuhunyushwa ngokuthi "izakhiwo" zokwakha, okwakubonakala kimi ukuthi kuncane okucatshangelwa emhlabeni we-Art of Painting. Kakade emdwebeni wesibili, sibona uPinoccio enesimo sengqondo esiphambene ngokuphelele, ngoba manje u-vargas i-apula esandleni sakhe kanye nekhilikithi noma unembeza uthukuthele, ngoba uPinoccio akazange amnake. Ngaphezu komqondo wokulandisa ku-Art, ngasikhathi sinye, le midwebo ikhombisa kanye ne-parody dualisms kanye ne-bipolarities esesiyazi kakade. Isibonelo, phakathi kwe-dialectic ne-ontology, noma umbono "we-Aesthetic" woBuciko nomunye, umbono wePhilosophical of Art, ovame ukuba khona futhi ohambisanayo, kodwa ongahlali ndawonye, uqhelelana nomunye. Ngokuqondene nokudweba njengalokhu, lo mbono uwukwethulwa kabusha kokuhlukaniswa (izethulo) kanye nokuhlangana ngokwesiko (ukweyisa ukumelwa okungaphansi komunye komunye ngokushintshana Emlandweni), hhayi "komfanekiso", kodwa weShadi.